{"id":9705,"date":"2025-10-02T11:17:07","date_gmt":"2025-10-02T09:17:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/?p=9705"},"modified":"2025-10-07T15:06:58","modified_gmt":"2025-10-07T13:06:58","slug":"alkoholverbot-auf-see","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/","title":{"rendered":"Alcohol ban at sea \u2013 but no entitlement to standby pay"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"
If you have any questions about this topic, please contact me by phone at 040 524 717 830<\/a> or by email to lugowski@smart-arbeitsrecht.de<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

A captain demanded more than \u20ac100,000 for alleged standby time \u2013 arguing that he was prohibited from consuming alcohol during his off-duty time on board. However, both the Hamburg Labor Court and the Hamburg Regional Labor Court rejected his claim. The judges reasoned that a ban on alcohol does not constitute a sufficient restriction to legally classify off-duty time as compensated on-call duty. This clear ruling sends a clear message \u2013 because not every private restriction automatically leads to a claim for compensation under labor law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n


<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

What awaits you:<\/h2>\n
    \n
  1. LAG Hamburg: Alcohol ban on board is not a basis for standby pay\n<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. LAG Hamburg: No entitlement to compensation for alcohol-free leisure time on board\n<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. LAG Hamburg: Alcohol ban is not an order for on-call duty\n<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Seafarers as a special case under labor law: No entitlement to remuneration for standby time\n<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. European Working Time Directive: No advantage for seafarers on call\n<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. Hamburg Labor Court: EU Working Time Directive does not apply to seafarers \u2013 no obligation to pay if alcohol is prohibited\n<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

    LAG Hamburg: Alcohol ban on board is not a basis for standby pay<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    In its ruling of November 13, 2024 (case no. 7 SLa 16\/24), the Hamburg Regional Labor Court ruled: A blanket alcohol ban on ships does not justify a claim to compensation for alleged standby time. According to the court, a shipping company's safety-related zero-alcohol policy does not constitute such a significant restriction that leisure time would legally be considered working time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The court also emphasized that European case law on the Working Time Directive is not directly applicable to seafarers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The ruling provides clarity in maritime labor law \u2013 and offers important guidance for shipping companies, human resources departments, and labor law advisors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Do you need legally sound assessments regarding working time arrangements or on-call duties? Our employment law firm supports you with sound advice and proven solutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    LAG Hamburg: No entitlement to compensation for alcohol-free leisure time on board<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    A captain employed since 2007 demanded over \u20ac108,000 from his shipping company, arguing that his alcohol-free leisure time on board was considered paid standby duty. The reason for this was an internal memo from 2022 in which the international shipping company reiterated its alcohol ban on board. This ban was intended to ensure the crew's operational readiness in an emergency and was permissible under labor law, even without a legal basis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The captain then demanded the statutory minimum wage for more than 11,000 hours of on-call time. The Hamburg Labor Court rejected the claim \u2013 as did the Hamburg Regional Labor Court in the second instance. Both courts made it clear that a general ban on alcohol consumption during off-call time does not constitute such a significant restriction that it justifies a claim to compensation for on-call duty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Do you need legal clarity regarding working hours, on-call models, or industry-specific regulations? Our employment law firm is available to provide you with in-depth advice\u2014please contact us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    LAG Hamburg: Alcohol ban is not an order for on-call duty<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The Hamburg Regional Labor Court made it unequivocally clear in its ruling: The reference to the existing alcohol ban on board does not constitute a new labor law instruction, but merely the confirmation of an existing internal company policy. The human resources department had merely suggested to the captain that the zero alcohol limit be explicitly incorporated into his employment contract in the future. The judges did not consider this a new labor law order. While the court acknowledged that an alcohol ban can certainly influence leisure activities on board, this restriction does not constitute a claim to remuneration in the sense of on-call duty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Permanent presence on board is a typical aspect of a seafaring job. Furthermore, the alcohol ban primarily serves general safety on board\u2014not the captain's constant availability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Are you wondering when free time becomes payable on-call time? Our employment law firm can support you with in-depth expertise on working time models, employer obligations, and employee rights\u2014contact us!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Seafarers as a special case under labor law: No entitlement to remuneration for standby time<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    According to the Hamburg Regional Labor Court, even an explicit order for on-call duty by the human resources department would not have given rise to any entitlement to compensation. Neither the individual employment contract nor the relevant collective wage agreement (HTV-See) contain corresponding provisions regarding remunerated on-call time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The court also points out that the collective agreement already takes into account the fact that seafarers typically spend their leisure time on board. This special feature of the maritime employment relationship is taken into account in the collective agreement and does not automatically lead to a claim for additional remuneration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Whether you're a shipping company, captain, or crew member \u2013 we'll examine your employment law claims at sea with expertise and a solution-oriented approach. Schedule a consultation now!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    European Working Time Directive: No advantage for seafarers on call<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The Hamburg Regional Labor Court clarified that the European Working Time Directive (Directive 2003\/88\/EC) also does not establish a captain's right to compensation for alleged standby time. The directive does explicitly distinguish between genuine rest time and standby duty, during which employees must be available to the employer at the workplace.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled several times that on-call duty is generally to be classified as working time \u2013 especially when employees are outside their usual living environment and have only limited access to leisure time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    However, this case law does not apply in this specific case. Seafarers are expressly excluded from the scope of the Directive, according to Article 1(3).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Are you looking for legally sound advice on working time regulations, on-call duty, or industry-specific exceptions? Our employment law firm supports you nationwide \u2013 competently, experienced, and solution-oriented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Hamburg Labor Court: EU Working Time Directive does not apply to seafarers \u2013 no obligation to pay if alcohol is prohibited<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The Hamburg Regional Labor Court clarified: According to Article 1, paragraph 3, the European Working Time Directive (Directive 2003\/88\/EC) expressly does not apply to seafarers. Instead, a special agreement between the European Community Shipowners' Associations (ECSA) and the Federation of Transport Workers' Unions in the EU (FST) from 1998 applies in the maritime sector, which has determined working time regulations for seafarers at the European level since 1999.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    This so-called social partner agreement does not contain any general provisions regarding the remuneration of standby time. Only in the event that a seafarer is called to work during their rest period\u2014for example, because the engine room is unoccupied\u2014does the agreement provide for a right to appropriate compensatory rest periods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    A general claim to compensation for mere restrictions on leisure time \u2013 such as a ban on alcohol on board \u2013 cannot be derived from this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Our employment law firm provides sound, practical advice to shipping companies, crew members, and human resources managers\u2014arrange a non-binding initial consultation now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n



    <\/p>\n\n\n\n


    <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Because he wasn't allowed to consume alcohol on board during his off-duty hours, a captain demanded over \u20ac100,000 in back pay. Both the labor court and the Hamburg Regional Labor Court rejected the claim. Our labor law experts explain why.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9706,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[39,42,41],"class_list":["post-9705","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-allgemein","tag-alkoholverbot","tag-bereitschaftsdienst","tag-kapitaen"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAlkoholverbot auf See \u2013 aber kein Anspruch auf Bereitschaftsverg\u00fctung | Smart-Arbeitsrecht<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Ein Kapit\u00e4n verlangte mehr als 100.000 Euro f\u00fcr Bereitschaftszeiten \u2013 da ihm w\u00e4hrend seiner Freizeit an Bord der Alkoholkonsum untersagt war.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Alkoholverbot auf See \u2013 aber kein Anspruch auf Bereitschaftsverg\u00fctung | Smart-Arbeitsrecht\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ein Kapit\u00e4n verlangte mehr als 100.000 Euro f\u00fcr Bereitschaftszeiten \u2013 da ihm w\u00e4hrend seiner Freizeit an Bord der Alkoholkonsum untersagt war.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Smart-Arbeitsrecht\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-02T09:17:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-07T13:06:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AdobeStock_1552603942.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2912\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1632\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Raphael Lugowski\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Raphael Lugowski\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/\",\"name\":\"Alkoholverbot auf See \u2013 aber kein Anspruch auf Bereitschaftsverg\u00fctung | Smart-Arbeitsrecht\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AdobeStock_1552603942.jpeg\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/#\/schema\/person\/aa572512b09294d8a6b4243ad3039813\"},\"description\":\"Ein Kapit\u00e4n verlangte mehr als 100.000 Euro f\u00fcr Bereitschaftszeiten \u2013 da ihm w\u00e4hrend seiner Freizeit an Bord der Alkoholkonsum untersagt war.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AdobeStock_1552603942.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AdobeStock_1552603942.jpeg\",\"width\":2912,\"height\":1632},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Alkoholverbot auf See \u2013 aber kein Anspruch auf Bereitschaftsverg\u00fctung\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/\",\"name\":\"Smart-Arbeitsrecht\",\"description\":\"Kanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/raphael-lugowski\/#lawyer\",\"name\":\"Raphael Lugowski\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bc641ff1de7bc0326348a21cebbd1ff6a5f98b1c8bb7023dcd498f809d0f2b7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bc641ff1de7bc0326348a21cebbd1ff6a5f98b1c8bb7023dcd498f809d0f2b7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Raphael Lugowski\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/author\/raphael-lugowski\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Alcohol ban at sea \u2013 but no entitlement to standby pay | Smart Labor Law","description":"A captain demanded more than 100,000 euros for standby time \u2013 because he was prohibited from consuming alcohol during his off-duty time on board.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Alkoholverbot auf See \u2013 aber kein Anspruch auf Bereitschaftsverg\u00fctung | Smart-Arbeitsrecht","og_description":"Ein Kapit\u00e4n verlangte mehr als 100.000 Euro f\u00fcr Bereitschaftszeiten \u2013 da ihm w\u00e4hrend seiner Freizeit an Bord der Alkoholkonsum untersagt war.","og_url":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/","og_site_name":"Smart-Arbeitsrecht","article_published_time":"2025-10-02T09:17:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-07T13:06:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2912,"height":1632,"url":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AdobeStock_1552603942.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Raphael Lugowski","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Raphael Lugowski","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/","url":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/","name":"Alcohol ban at sea \u2013 but no entitlement to standby pay | Smart Labor Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AdobeStock_1552603942.jpeg","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/#\/schema\/person\/aa572512b09294d8a6b4243ad3039813"},"description":"A captain demanded more than 100,000 euros for standby time \u2013 because he was prohibited from consuming alcohol during his off-duty time on board.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AdobeStock_1552603942.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AdobeStock_1552603942.jpeg","width":2912,"height":1632},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/alkoholverbot-auf-see\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Alkoholverbot auf See \u2013 aber kein Anspruch auf Bereitschaftsverg\u00fctung"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/","name":"Smart labor law","description":"Employment law firm","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/raphael-lugowski\/#lawyer","name":"Raphael Lugowski","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bc641ff1de7bc0326348a21cebbd1ff6a5f98b1c8bb7023dcd498f809d0f2b7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bc641ff1de7bc0326348a21cebbd1ff6a5f98b1c8bb7023dcd498f809d0f2b7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Raphael Lugowski"},"url":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/author\/raphael-lugowski\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9705","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9705"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9705\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9712,"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9705\/revisions\/9712"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9706"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9705"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9705"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smart-arbeitsrecht.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9705"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}