Contact us now 040 524 717 830
If you have any questions about this topic, please contact me by phone at 040 524 717 830 or by email to lugowski@smart-arbeitsrecht.de

Legal boundaries between control, data protection and co-determination

The technical monitoring of employees has long been a part of everyday business life. Cameras in entrance areas, GPS systems in vehicles, software for performance or communication analysis, and IT-supported monitoring in home offices are all technically feasible today. However, only some of these methods are legally permissible. This is because every form of employee monitoring infringes on the general right to privacy and is subject to strict labor and data protection laws.


Data protection as the starting point for all surveillance

The central benchmark is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Every monitoring measure constitutes the processing of personal data and therefore requires a sound legal basis. Article 6 of the GDPR and, in the employment context, Section 26 of the German Federal Data Protection Act (BDSG) are particularly relevant.

Monitoring is only permissible if it is necessary and the employer's interests do not outweigh the employees' fundamental rights. A general appeal to productivity, efficiency, or control is insufficient. Necessity, purpose, and proportionality must each be specifically justified and documented.

Consent does not usually play a significant role in the employment relationship, as it is generally not given voluntarily due to the dependency relationship.

Video surveillance, GPS and IT tools

Video surveillance may be permissible, for example in publicly accessible areas such as entrances or sales floors, if it serves security purposes and is not aimed at the permanent performance monitoring of individual employees. It is generally not permitted in particularly sensitive areas such as changing rooms, restrooms, or break rooms.

GPS tracking of vehicles is only permitted to the extent that it is necessary for operational purposes, such as route planning or vehicle security. Continuous monitoring or tracking outside of working hours is prohibited. Employees must be transparently informed about the type, scope, and purpose of the tracking.

The use of software to analyze behavior or performance is particularly sensitive. Covert surveillance measures such as keyloggers, screenshot tools, or comprehensive tracking constitute a serious intrusion into privacy. The Federal Labor Court has ruled that such measures are only permissible in cases of concrete suspicion of a serious breach of duty and may not be used without cause.

Monitoring of emails and digital communication

Reviewing work emails or communication tools like Teams or Slack is particularly complex from a legal perspective. In addition to data protection law, telecommunications law also plays a role. Depending on the nature of private use, the confidentiality of telecommunications may apply, now regulated by the Telecommunications and Digital Services Data Protection Act.

Regardless, access to communications is only permissible if there is a clear legal basis under data protection law. For internal investigations, Section 26 Paragraph 1 Sentence 2 of the German Federal Data Protection Act (BDSG) is particularly relevant, as it permits processing in cases of suspected criminal offenses or serious breaches of duty. This requires documented factual evidence, the necessity of the measure, and a balancing of interests in favor of the employer.

Continuous or indiscriminate monitoring of communications is inadmissible.

Performance control and proportionality

Performance reviews are generally permissible under labor law, but are subject to strict limits. Every review infringes on the general right to privacy of employees and simultaneously constitutes the processing of personal data. Therefore, the principles of necessity, proportionality, and transparency are paramount.

In particular, permanent or continuous monitoring that creates constant pressure to conform is inadmissible. Technical capabilities do not justify comprehensive control. However, time-limited, random, and purpose-oriented performance reviews may be permissible, provided they serve a legitimate aim and no less intrusive means are available.

Covert monitoring is generally unlawful. Employees must be informed whether and to what extent performance data is being collected. Objective measurements of individual work results may be permissible, as long as they do not lead to the creation of a comprehensive behavioral or personality profile.

In companies with a works council, Section 87 Paragraph 1 No. 6 of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG) must also be observed. The use of technical systems for performance monitoring is legally contestable without prior co-determination.

Prohibitions on the use of evidence

A common misconception is that data protection breaches automatically lead to the exclusion of evidence. This is not the case. Instead, the courts conduct a balancing of interests. An exclusion of evidence is only considered if the employee's right to privacy outweighs the employee's right to privacy in the specific case.

If data was collected openly and serves to investigate intentional breaches of duty, it can be used despite data protection violations. Data protection is not protection against crime.

Co-determination of the works council

In companies with a works council, monitoring is further limited by works constitution law. According to Section 87, Paragraph 1, Number 6 of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG), there is a mandatory right of co-determination regarding the introduction and use of technical equipment that is suitable for monitoring the behavior or performance of employees. The decisive factor is the objective suitability, not the intended use.

This right of co-determination regularly concerns the technical equipment as such. However, individual measures taken in cases of concrete suspicion are not necessarily subject to co-determination, provided they are carried out within the framework of existing company agreements.

Conclusion

Employers have legitimate interests in monitoring their employees. However, these interests end where personal rights, data protection, and employee participation are violated. Technical capabilities do not justify unlimited surveillance. Every measure must be proportionate, transparent, and legally sound.

For companies, this means that monitoring is only legally sound with a clear legal basis, thorough documentation, and early involvement of the works council. For employees, the rule is: not all monitoring is permitted – and unlawful monitoring remains open to challenge.

Frequently Asked Questions for employee monitoring and internal investigations

When is an employer allowed to monitor employees or conduct internal investigations?
Is mere suspicion sufficient grounds to search emails or communications?
Is it permissible to review private content in professional email accounts?
Is continuous or indiscriminate surveillance permissible?
What role does informing employees play?
Does the works council need to be involved in monitoring measures?
Are external service providers allowed to be used in internal investigations?
Is a data protection impact assessment necessary?
Does a data protection breach automatically lead to the exclusion of evidence?
How can companies minimize legal risks associated with employee monitoring?
If you have any questions about this topic, please contact me by phone at 040 524 717 830 or by email to lugowski@smart-arbeitsrecht.de

New obligations, increasing requirements and growing liability risks for companies

The year 2026 brings with it a number of changes to labor law that will have significant practical implications for employers. Human resources departments, in particular, will need to implement new transparency obligations, documentation requirements, and compensation regulations in a legally compliant manner. While employees in certain areas will benefit financially, the organizational and legal burden for companies will increase noticeably. Early legal advice from a labor law expert will help reduce liability risks and avoid compliance violations.


Minimum wage increase and new challenges for mini-jobs

As of January 1, 2026, the statutory minimum wage was raised to €13.90 gross per hour. The legal basis is Section 1, Paragraph 2 of the Minimum Wage Act (MiLoG). Employers are obligated to comply with this minimum wage, regardless of the contractual arrangements.

There are immediate consequences for marginal employment. The earnings limit for mini-jobs has been adjusted to €603 per month. The relevant provision is Section 8, Paragraph 1, Number 1 of the German Social Code, Book IV (SGB IV). In practice, the combination of the rising minimum wage and the fixed earnings limit means that the maximum permissible monthly working hours will decrease further. Even minor overtime can trigger mandatory social security contributions. Employers should therefore carefully monitor working hours and regularly review existing employment contracts.

The minimum wage increase is particularly important in the care sector. From July 2026, higher sector-specific minimum wages will apply based on the Care Working Conditions Ordinance. Care facilities must adjust their remuneration structures accordingly to avoid violations of the Minimum Wage Act.

Active pension: New incentives with potential for legal conflict

The so-called "active pension" was introduced at the beginning of 2026. It is designed to incentivize employees to continue working voluntarily even after reaching the standard retirement age. Additional monthly earnings of up to €2,000 remain tax-free; income exceeding this amount is subject to regular income tax.

In principle, the existing system will remain in place under social security law. The regulation is initially temporary and will be evaluated after two years. The exclusion of certain groups of people, particularly the self-employed, freelancers, and those in marginal employment (minijobs), is legally controversial. In this context, constitutional concerns are already being discussed with regard to the principle of equal treatment enshrined in Article 3, Paragraph 1 of the Basic Law. Initial lawsuits have been announced and could lead to court decisions during 2026.

Later retirement for severely disabled people

For severely disabled individuals, the retirement age for a full pension without deductions has been raised. According to Section 236a of the Sixth Book of the German Social Code, a full pension without deductions is now only possible upon reaching the age of 64. Early retirement from the age of 61 remains permissible, but is still subject to permanent deductions. A recognized degree of disability of at least 50 is a prerequisite. Transitional provisions apply to older age groups.

Pay transparency will become a central issue in labor law in 2026.

The greatest need for action on the part of employers arises from the implementation of the EU Pay Transparency Directive (Directive (EU) 2023/970), which must be transposed into national law by 7 June 2026. The aim is the consistent enforcement of the principle of equal pay for equal or equivalent work.

In the future, employers will be required to include information about compensation or salary ranges in job postings. Furthermore, employees' rights to information will be expanded. This development is linked to Section 7 of the German Pay Transparency Act (EntgTranspG) and goes significantly beyond its scope. Violations will result in fines and claims for damages.

These guidelines are supported by the current case law of the Federal Labor Court. According to the so-called "pair comparison" case law, it is sufficient that a female employee earns less than a specifically named colleague in a comparable position. In this case, discrimination is presumed, and the employer bears the burden of proof for objective reasons for the pay difference (Federal Labor Court, Judgment of October 23, 2025, Case No. 8 AZR 300/24).

Time tracking remains a perennial issue.

The obligation to record working time already exists. The legal basis is Section 3 Paragraph 2 Number 1 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. The Federal Labour Court has expressly confirmed this obligation and derived it from the Working Time Directive in accordance with EU law (Federal Labour Court, decision of 13 September 2022, case no. 1 ABR 22/21).

Legal regulations are expected to be more specific by 2026, particularly regarding electronic time tracking and more flexible working time models. Even though details are still pending, employers should already ensure that working hours are fully, objectively, and transparently documented.

Works council elections 2026 and increasing susceptibility to errors

Regular works council elections will take place between March and May 2026. The relevant provisions are those of the Works Constitution Act, in particular Sections 7 et seq. The increasing complexity of company organizational structures increases the susceptibility of the election process to errors. Formal errors can lead to an election challenge under Section 19 of the Works Constitution Act. Therefore, early legal support during election preparation is strongly recommended.

Conclusion: 2026 requires active labor law management

The 2026 labor law will not bring relief to employers, but rather a further intensification of legal obligations. Minimum wage, pay transparency, time tracking, and works council elections require structural adjustments and legally sound processes. Those who act early and review their internal procedures reduce legal risks and avoid costly disputes. Sound legal advice on labor law is a crucial factor for success in this regard.

Frequently asked questions about Labor Law 2026

What changes to labor law will come into effect for employers in 2026?
What will the statutory minimum wage be in 2026?
What impact will the minimum wage in 2026 have on mini-jobs?
What does the active pension mean for employers and employees?
What obligations does the EU Pay Transparency Directive 2026 entail?
From what point are companies required to produce payroll reports?
When does unlawful pay discrimination occur?
Will there be a legal requirement to record working hours in 2026?
Will overtime pay be tax-free in 2026?
Why should employers seek legal advice on employment law in 2026?
If you have any questions about this topic, please contact me by phone at 040 524 717 830 or by email to lugowski@smart-arbeitsrecht.de

Employee surveys: between digitalization, surveillance and co-determination

Digital employee surveys have become standard practice in modern HR. However, the use of AI-supported analytics is fundamentally changing the legal framework. What was once considered a harmless, anonymous survey can now be a monitoring tool subject to co-determination. Companies using AI-based survey or people analytics tools are legally obligated to involve the works council. Otherwise, the entire system risks being deemed legally invalid.


Co-determination according to the Works Constitution Act

The central point of reference is Section 87 Paragraph 1 Number 6 of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG). According to this provision, the works council has a mandatory right of co-determination regarding the introduction and use of technical equipment designed to monitor the behavior or performance of employees. The decisive factor is not whether monitoring actually takes place, but whether the system is objectively capable of doing so. The mere theoretical possibility of evaluating performance or behavior is sufficient.

This is precisely where the use of AI comes in. Modern survey platforms no longer limit themselves to collecting individual responses. They analyze free text, recognize sentiments, create group profiles, and evaluate response behavior. Even if individuals are not to be identified, the technical possibility of re-identification or group assignment can be sufficient to trigger participation.

Anonymity does not protect against participation.

In practice, it is often argued that employee surveys are anonymous and therefore not subject to co-determination. This argument no longer holds true for AI-supported systems. The decisive factor is not the employer's intended use, but the technical capabilities of the tool employed.

AI-based sentiment analysis, automatic reminder functions, or the evaluation of participation rates can allow conclusions to be drawn about behavior, engagement, or work discipline. This affects workplace conduct, which can additionally establish a right of co-determination under Section 87 Paragraph 1 Number 1 of the German Works Constitution Act (BetrVG).

Information and control rights of the works council

In addition to legally enforceable co-determination rights, there are extensive rights to information. According to Section 90, Paragraph 1, Number 3 of the German Works Constitution Act (BetrVG), the employer is obligated to inform the works council at an early stage about the planning and introduction of new technical processes. This explicitly also applies to AI systems.

The employer must disclose not only which questions are asked, but also how the data is processed and what analyses are technically possible. The works council is entitled to a transparent explanation of how the system works. A mere reference to data protection or provider certifications is insufficient.

Section 80, paragraph 3 of the German Works Constitution Act (BetrVG) is particularly relevant. Since the Works Council Modernization Act, it has been explicitly clarified that the works council may regularly consult experts when AI is being used. The involvement of external expertise is legally required. This is intended to compensate for the employer's structural knowledge advantage.

Selection decisions and AI

AI systems are increasingly being used for personnel-related decisions, such as evaluations, talent analyses, or the preparation of dismissals. If AI is used in the development or application of selection guidelines, Section 95 Paragraph 2a of the German Works Constitution Act (BetrVG) applies. The works council's right of co-determination exists even if the selection criteria are developed wholly or partially automatically.

Impact of the European AI Regulation

The European AI Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) has been in force since August 2024. While it does not contain direct co-determination rules, it tightens the requirements for transparency, documentation, and traceability of AI systems. These requirements have an indirect impact on works constitution law.

An AI system whose functionality is not clearly documented cannot be properly reviewed by the works council. Without this transparency, legally compliant implementation is virtually impossible. Therefore, employers must disclose how AI-supported surveys work, even for regulatory reasons alone.

Case law on the demarcation

Current case law demonstrates that not every use of AI automatically requires co-determination. The Hamburg Labor Court ruled on January 16, 2024 (Case No. 24 BVGa 1/24) that no co-determination rights apply when employees voluntarily use AI tools via private accounts and the employer has no access to the data. However, the legal assessment changes as soon as company systems are used or evaluations are carried out centrally.

Practical consequences for companies

Companies should not treat AI-supported surveys as a purely HR measure, but rather as a technical implementation subject to co-determination. Significant risks arise from the early involvement of the works council. These include not only conflicts under works constitution law, but also the invalidity of the entire measure.

A company agreement is regularly required, clearly regulating which data is collected, which analyses are permitted, and for what purposes the results may not be used. In particular, use for performance or behavior monitoring must be explicitly excluded.

Conclusion

The use of AI in employee surveys marks a legal turning point. Anonymity is no longer sufficient to exclude co-determination rights. The crucial factor is the system's technical capability for monitoring. Employers should only introduce AI surveys if transparency, documentation, and co-determination are guaranteed from the outset. Those who involve the works council too late, or not at all, risk not only conflicts but also a legally untenable system.

Frequently asked questions about the co-determination rights of the works council in AI surveys

Does the works council need to be involved in AI-supported employee surveys?
Is it sufficient if the employee survey is conducted anonymously?
When does an AI survey qualify as a surveillance tool?
What role does Section 87 Paragraph 1 No. 1 of the Works Constitution Act play in AI surveys?
What information obligations does the employer have towards the works council?
Is the works council allowed to consult experts on AI systems?
Does co-determination also apply to people analytics tools?
Can AI surveys be introduced without a company agreement?
What significance does the EU AI Regulation have for co-determination?
Is there already case law regarding AI surveys and co-determination?
If you have any questions about this topic, please contact me by phone at 040 524 717 830 or by email to lugowski@smart-arbeitsrecht.de

Organizing a works council election requires careful preparation – ideally well in advance of the actual election date. The legal regulations of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG) and the Election Regulations (WO) are extensive and often difficult to understand. For the election committee, this means that all requirements must be strictly adhered to. Even the smallest procedural errors can lead to the election being challenged or even declared invalid.

A clearly structured process and a solid legal foundation are therefore essential for conducting the election properly. Our specialized employment lawyers will support you from the very beginning – from planning and preparation to the legally compliant execution of the election. This way, you reduce liability risks and ensure that all formal requirements are met.

We have compiled a concise and easy-to-understand overview of the individual steps involved in the regular election process. Rely on our expertise in labor law – to ensure your 2026 works council election runs smoothly and legally.


Initiating a works council election – legally compliant with legal support in labor law

The official start of a works council election is marked by the issuance of the election notice by the election committee. This document marks the beginning of the formal election process and must contain all legally required information. The workforce is then officially informed of the upcoming election through public posting within the company.

Before the election notice can be published, an important intermediate step is required: Together with the representatives of the senior management, it must be determined which employees actually belong to the group of senior management as defined in Section 18a of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG). Only employees who not Those belonging to this group are eligible to participate in the election or to be elected themselves. The electoral register is then compiled based on this determination.

For this legal review and allocation, you should allow at least two weeks, as stipulated by law. Following this, the electoral roll, which includes all eligible and eligible employees, will be compiled. This roll, along with the election notice, must be posted in the workplace to ensure transparency and verifiability.

Our experienced employment lawyers support election committees in every phase of the works council election – from initiation to vote counting. This ensures that all steps are legally compliant. Request legally sound support for your works council election now!

Election notice for the works council election – this information is mandatory

The election notice is the core element of every works council election and establishes the legal framework for a proper election procedure. Section 3 of the election regulations precisely defines the minimum content. The election committee is obligated to record all required information completely and accurately; otherwise, the election can be challenged or even declared invalid.

The most important mandatory information in the election notice includes:

  • The number of works council members to be elected
  • The guidelines for election proposals and candidate lists
  • The specification of the gender quota (minority gender) and all relevant deadlines.
  • Election day, including the date of voting
  • Place, date and time of the public vote count
  • Information on the possibility of voting by mail

Only if all legally required information is correctly stated is the election notice valid – and the works council election legally secure.

Submitting nominations – deadlines, requirements and legally compliant procedure

The legally stipulated deadlines begin to run with the publication of the election notice. Within two weeks Employees can object to the electoral roll – and within the same period, the Election proposals must be submitted to the election committee.

No list submitted? Note the deadline!
If no valid nomination has been received after this two-week period, the election committee is obliged to... one-week grace period to grant. If no valid proposal is submitted even within this grace period, the works council election is considered to have failed – a special case that rarely occurs in practice.

Examination of nominations by the electoral board
After the submission deadline, the election committee carefully reviews all submitted nominations for formal and substantive validity. If any deficiencies are found, the respective list leader must be informed immediately. As long as the deadline is still open, incorrect nominations can be corrected or resubmitted to ensure validity.

Order on the ballot – the decision is made by drawing lots
After the submission deadline, the election committee invites the list leaders to determine the order of candidates on the ballot. If there are multiple valid lists, the order is determined by... by drawing lots determined. However, if there is only one valid nomination, this step is omitted – in this case, a Majority voting instead, where the votes are directly allocated to the candidates on that list.

Adherence to deadlines and formal requirements is crucial for the validity of the works council election. Our experienced employment lawyers support election committees in ensuring legally sound review and execution. Have your election documents reviewed now – for a legally valid election!

Announcement of candidates – inform in a timely and legally compliant manner

The valid nominations or candidate lists must be publicly announced within the company no later than one week before election day. This obligation is enshrined in law and serves the purpose of transparency – all employees should be informed in a timely manner which candidates are standing for election.

Especially in larger companies – particularly if postal voting is planned – it is advisable to announce the election results early. This is because the postal voting documents may only be sent out once the official nominations have been properly published within the company.

If the announcement is made late, this can delay the dispatch of postal voting documents – and in the worst case, lead to a challenge of the works council election. Correct and timely publication is therefore essential to ensure the smooth running of the election.

Conducting the works council election – legally compliant and well-organized

To ensure that election day runs smoothly and legally, the election must be properly prepared and designed to prevent manipulation. The election committee is responsible for complying with all organizational and legal requirements.

Key points include:

  • Setting up a suitable polling station or several polling stations, if necessary
  • Provision of a sealed and tamper-proof ballot box
  • Verification of eligibility to vote based on the current voter list
  • Organization of election materials and providing resources for barrier-free voting

Careful planning and clear responsibilities help to make the election process transparent, legally sound and comprehensible for all employees.

Vote counting and announcement of the election result – transparent and comprehensible

Immediately after the polling stations close, the public vote count is carried out by the election committee. Transparency is paramount – all persons present must be able to understand the counting process.

The preliminary election results will then be announced and carefully documented. This includes the preparation of an election record, in which all relevant data and findings are recorded. This record will be signed by the entire election committee and will form the basis for the subsequent announcement of the final election results.

Proper documentation protects against ambiguities and is crucial to ensuring the legality of the works council election.

Inaugural meeting – handover of responsibility to the new works council

Once the final election result is determined, the final phase of the election process begins. It is now the responsibility of the election committee to properly prepare the handover to the newly elected body.

  • Notify the selected employees immediately after their election.
  • Publish the names of the elected members operational.
  • Download no later than one week after election day. to the inaugural meeting of the new works council.
  • Hand over all election documents to the new committee – with this handover, the work of the election committee officially ends.

A clearly structured closing ensures a smooth transition and guarantees compliance with all legal requirements.

Especially in the final stages, formal errors can easily occur. Our experienced employment lawyers ensure that your works council election is completed correctly and on time. Request legally sound support until the handover now!






If you have any questions about this topic, please contact me by phone at 040 524 717 830 or by email to lugowski@smart-arbeitsrecht.de

The next works council elections will take place nationwide in spring 2026. However, before employees can cast their votes, the electoral board must compile the correct electoral roll. This raises the key question: Who is eligible to vote (active voting right) – and who is allowed to stand for election (passive voting right)?

A legally compliant election can only be guaranteed if the electoral roll is compiled in accordance with the law. Errors in the roll can lead to challenges and subsequently invalidate the election. As an electoral board, you bear a special responsibility in this regard.

In this article, we explain who is eligible to vote and stand for election, which legal criteria must be met, and what you as an election committee should pay attention to when compiling the electoral roll for the 2026 works council election.


Of central importance: The electoral roll for the works council election

The voters' list is a crucial document in every works council election. It informs who is eligible to vote (active voting right) and who is eligible to stand as a candidate (passive voting right). As the election committee, you are obligated to publish a complete and accurate voters' list in the company along with the election announcement.

The electoral roll contains all eligible employees in the company. Only those on this roll may participate in the election. At the same time, all employees have the right to check whether their registration has been correct. Therefore, the electoral roll must be displayed for inspection in an accessible location in the company until voting is complete.

According to Section 2, Paragraph 2 of the Election Regulations (WO), the employer is legally obligated to provide the election committee with all necessary information and documents to correctly compile the electoral roll. As the election committee, you should specifically request the employer to provide you with the necessary information – ideally in writing and with specific details.

Errors in the electoral roll are one of the most common causes of challenges to works council elections. Our labor law experts will review your documents and guide you through every step – ensuring a legally compliant and contestable election. Request a free consultation now – so your electoral roll is legally sound!

Mistakes on the voter list? You can appeal!

The electoral roll forms the basis for the works council election, so its accuracy and timeliness are crucial. But what happens if an error is discovered?

Every employee has the right to lodge an objection to the electoral roll with the electoral board within two weeks of the election announcement being issued. If the objection is deemed justified, the roll must be corrected or supplemented accordingly.

After the two-week deadline has expired, no further changes are possible on the basis of objections – the electoral board must reject late objections.

Between the time the voter list is drawn up and election day, personnel changes may occur within the company—for example, through hiring, terminations, or transfers. Therefore, the electoral board is obligated to continuously update the list to ensure that all eligible voters are correctly recorded—and no one is unfairly excluded.

An incorrect or outdated voter list can jeopardize the entire works council election. Have your voter list legally reviewed by our employment law firm – and protect yourself against legal challenges. Request legal support now – we will reliably guide you through the entire election process.

The active right to vote in works council elections – who is allowed to vote?

A key question arises in the context of the 2026 works council elections: Who is eligible to vote? The so-called active right to vote regulates who is entitled to cast their vote in the election. The legal basis for this can be found in Section 7, Sentence 1 of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG). Accordingly, only persons who meet all three requirements are entitled to vote:

  • Employee status
    All persons who are considered employees within the meaning of the law are entitled to vote – regardless of whether they are employed full-time, part-time, on a temporary basis, on a marginal basis or at home. 
    • Employees eligible to vote include:
      • Apprentices, provided they are at least 16 years old
      • Mini-jobbers
      • Part-time and temporary workers
      • Employees on parental leave, sick leave or vacation
      • Employees in active partial retirement
      • Working students and volunteers
      • Field service and teleworkers
      • Temporary workers, provided they are employed in the company for more than three months
      • ABM workers (since BAG decision 2004, 7 ABR 6/04)
      • Public service employees assigned to the company
    • However, the following are not eligible to vote:
      • Executive employees (Section 5 (3) BetrVG)
      • Employers, managing directors, board members
      • Self-employed and freelancers
      • 1-euro jobbers
      • Employees under 16 years of age
      • Employees in the passive phase of partial retirement
  • Length of service
    • Only those who belong to the specific company are entitled to vote – not all employees of the company or group.
    • Dependent business units participate in the election of the main business.
    • Independent company divisions can elect their own works council under certain conditions.
    • The distinction is often complex – we would be happy to advise you on this as part of our employment law election support.
  • Minimum age
    • Any employee who is at least 16 years old on election day may vote. 
    • The decisive factor is the day of voting, not the start of the election process. In elections lasting several days, the last day of voting counts.

Eligible voters must be carefully verified and documented. An inaccurate voter list can lead to a challenge to the election. Our employment law firm supports election boards in compiling legally compliant voter lists – nationwide and with decades of experience in employment law. Have your voter list reviewed now – for a legally compliant and uncontestable 2026 works council election!

The passive right to vote – who is eligible to stand for election to the works council?

Not everyone eligible to vote can also run for the works council. The so-called passive right to vote is regulated in Section 8 of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG) and determines who is considered an eligible employee in the 2026 works council election.

  • Eligible to vote are those who:
    • is eligible to vote (see Section 7 of the Works Constitution Act),
    • has reached the age of 18 and
    • has been part of the company for at least six months without interruption.
  • Crucial moment: election day
    • The six-month period is determined by the day of voting. For elections lasting several days, the last day of voting applies. 
    • If an employee was previously employed in another company within the same company or group, these periods will be taken into account.
    • Note: Periods of service before the age of 18 also count. For example, anyone who turns 18 on election day and has already been working for the company for a year is eligible to run.
  • Who is eligible to vote?
    In addition to traditional employees, these include:
    • Trainees, provided they work in a “real” company
    • Part-time workers
    • Homeworkers if they work predominantly for the company
    • Employees on maternity or parental leave
  • Who is excluded from the right to vote?
    • Temporary workers are generally not eligible to vote – neither so-called real nor fake ones. 
    • The Federal Labor Court (BAG, 13.10.2004 – 7 ABR 6/04) made this clear. 
    • Even if temporary agency workers are allowed to vote, they cannot be elected to the works council of the hiring company.

Correctly verifying the right to stand for election is crucial for a non-contestable election. Our employment law firm reliably reviews your candidate lists nationwide and with years of experience in works council elections. Have your candidates reviewed now – get a legally secure start to the 2026 works council elections.

Special case in the works council election: Who counts as a senior employee?

When compiling the electoral roll for the 2026 works council elections, the correct classification of executive employees presents a particular challenge. While Section 5, Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG) provides legal criteria, there is no clear definition. In practice, the electoral board must carefully examine whether a person qualifies as a executive employee—because this group of employees is neither eligible to vote nor to be elected.

  • What distinguishes senior managers?
    Senior managers assume entrepreneurial-like tasks within the company with their own decision-making power – for example, by:
    • Hiring and firing of employees
    • Granting or use of power of attorney
    • Responsibility for key personnel or budget decisions
    • Due to their special status, they are closer to the employer than to the rest of the workforce. Therefore, they are excluded from works council elections.
  • Impact on the electoral roll and eligibility to vote
    Senior managers will:
    • not registered on the electoral roll,
    • not taken into account when calculating the size of the works council (Section 9 of the Works Constitution Act) and
    • not counted in the number of works council members to be released (Section 38 of the Works Constitution Act).
    • Please note: The election is not automatically invalidated if a senior employee votes by mistake – a challenge can only be successful if there is evidence of influence on the election result.
  • Alternative representation of interests: the Speakers’ Committee
    • Senior employees are not without rights – they elect their own representative body, the Speakers’ Committee. 
    • This is usually elected at the same time as the works council election. 
    • To avoid overlaps, close coordination between the electoral boards of both bodies is necessary. 
    • In case of doubt, who belongs to the group of senior employees must be clarified jointly – on the basis of Section 18a of the Works Constitution Act.

The incorrect assignment of senior employees can make the election contestable. Our employment law firm supports you in legally compliant demarcation – with clear review criteria, legal classification, and practical experience. Have your voter list reviewed now – and legally clarify any uncertainties regarding senior employees!

Conclusion: Clarifying the status before the works council election – for greater legal certainty

In cases of doubt, it may be extremely sensible for reasons of legal certainty to have the status of individual employees determined by the labor court before the works council election – especially if the allocation procedure pursuant to Section 18a of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG) is not effective or does not lead to a clear result.

A judicial determination of status, for example on the question of whether an employee is to be classified as a managerial employee within the meaning of works constitution law, provides binding clarity – and prevents later challenges or costly disputes that can burden not only the election but also other operational processes.

Clarify any doubts early on – we'll assist you with legally compliant status checks and, if necessary, represent you in labor court proceedings. Contact us now – for legally compliant works council elections without any surprises.

FAQs – Frequently asked questions about active and passive voting rights in company elections

Why is the electoral list so legally significant for the works council election?
Who is eligible to vote in the 2026 works council election?
What conditions must be met for passive voting rights?
What role does the election committee play in the election process?
What role do data protection and information obligations play in the electoral register?
Can errors in the voter list be corrected?
What significance does employee status have for the right to vote?
What rules apply to public sector employees?
Why is a continuous update of the voter list necessary?
When is external support useful in works council elections?


If you have any questions about this topic, please contact me by phone at 040 524 717 830 or by email to lugowski@smart-arbeitsrecht.de

Digital elections offer greater convenience, lower costs, and higher participation—a concept that is attracting considerable interest in an increasingly digitalized workplace. This raises the question: Will employees be allowed to elect their works council online in the future?

While electronic voting has long been a reality in many other areas, works council elections remain subject to strict legal requirements. Currently, digital voting is not yet legally permitted – unless the legislature creates the necessary legal framework by 2026.


Online Works Council Election 2026: The current status – what has happened so far

The draft bill presented by the traffic light coalition in November 2024 to introduce online works council elections as part of a pilot project was not pursued further after the early end of the legislative period. This is due to the so-called discontinuity principle: All legislative initiatives that are not adopted by the end of the legislative period automatically lose their validity and must be reintroduced by a new federal government.

New federal government – new opportunities for online works council elections?

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD contains a clear commitment to the digitalization of employee participation in company processes—including the possibility of electing works councils online. It states:
"We will further develop co-determination. We will also enable online works council meetings and online staff assemblies as equivalent alternatives to in-person formats. In addition, the option to vote online will be enshrined in the Works Constitution Act."

This confirms that the political will is there. However, when and in what specific form online voting will be introduced in works council elections remains to be seen.

Conclusion: No law yet – but digital co-determination is gaining momentum

  • The introduction of online voting is set out as a goal in the coalition agreement, but has not yet been implemented by law.
  • An amendment to the Works Constitution Act would be necessary – a corresponding legislative procedure is still pending.
  • It remains to be seen whether the 2026 works council elections can be held digitally or whether implementation will be postponed to a later election period.

Companies and election boards should continue to plan for in-person and postal voting, but at the same time, closely monitor legal developments. We will inform you about new legal steps. Get legal advice now – and stay well prepared for the digital future of works council elections!




Works council elections strengthen co-determination within the company. Clear structures, legally compliant preparation, and careful implementation by the election committee are essential for a legally compliant process. Our labor law attorneys demonstrate what's important.

If you have any questions about this topic, please contact me by phone at 040 524 717 830 or by email to lugowski@smart-arbeitsrecht.de

Legally secure for the 2026 works council elections – with legal support in employment law

Preparation for a works council election should begin early—ideally well before the scheduled election date. This is because the legal requirements of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG) and the Election Regulations (WO) are complex and often difficult to understand for non-lawyers. However, as an election committee, you are obligated to comply with all legal regulations. Even minor formal errors can lead to the election being contested and declared invalid.

A structured process and in-depth knowledge of labor law are therefore crucial for a successful works council election. Our experienced labor law attorneys will support you every step of the way – from initial planning to legally compliant implementation. This minimizes risks and ensures that all formalities are correctly observed.

We've compiled a clear overview of the steps you'll face in the regular election process. Rely on our labor law expertise to ensure your works council election is on a sound legal footing.

Initiate works council elections – legally secure with legal support in employment law

The works council election officially begins with the issuance of the election notice by the election committee. This step marks the start of the normal election procedure: The election notice must contain all legally required information and be posted throughout the company. This provides the workforce with binding information that a works council election is taking place.

Before publishing the election announcement, an important legal step is required: In consultation with the representatives of the senior management, it must be clarified which employees belong to the group of senior management within the meaning of Section 18a of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG). Only those who are not considered senior management are entitled to vote or be elected. Only on this basis can you correctly compile the electoral register.

You should allow at least two weeks for the review and allocation process – as required by law. Then, you should compile the electoral roll, which includes all eligible and eligible employees. This roll must be publicly posted in the company along with the election notice.

Our specialized labor law attorneys advise election boards during all phases of the works council election and ensure that every step is carried out with legal compliance – from the initiation to the counting of the votes. Request advice on your works council election now – we'll provide you with legal support from the very beginning!

Election announcements for works council elections – these contents are required by law

The election announcement is a central element of the works council election and forms the basis for a legally compliant process. The minimum information it must contain is legally regulated in Section 3 of the Election Regulations (WO). As the election committee, you are obligated to provide this information completely and accurately – otherwise, the election may be contested.

The most important mandatory information in the election notice includes:

  • Number of works council members to be elected
  • Specifications for nominations and nomination lists
  • Information on the gender quota (minority gender) and all relevant deadlines
  • Election day (date of voting)
  • Place, date and time of the public vote count
  • Information on the possibility of voting by mail

A flawless election announcement is crucial to avoid legal risks. Our experienced employment law attorneys will review your documents and guide you through every step of the works council election – with legal certainty, practical expertise, and reliability.

Submitting nominations – deadlines, requirements and legally compliant implementation

As soon as the election announcement is published in the company, binding deadlines begin. Employees can file objections to the electoral roll within two weeks – and nominations must also be submitted to the election board within this period.

  • No list submitted? Note the deadline!
    • If no valid nomination has been submitted after the two-week period, the electoral board must grant a one-week grace period. 
    • If no valid proposal is submitted within this grace period, the works council election is deemed to have failed – a special case that, however, rarely occurs in practice.
  • Examination of nominations by the electoral board
    • After the deadline has expired, the electoral board will examine the submitted proposals for formal and substantive validity. 
    • If a nomination has deficiencies, the responsible list leader must be informed. 
    • As long as the submission deadline is still running, corrections or resubmissions can be made to ensure validity.
  • Order on the ballot paper – by lot
    • Immediately after the deadline for submitting nominations has expired, the Electoral Board invites the list leaders to determine the order on the ballot paper. 
    • If there are several valid lists, the order will be determined by drawing lots. 
    • If there is only one valid list, this step is omitted – in this case, the election is conducted as a majority vote, with the votes being awarded directly to the candidates on the single electoral proposal.

The deadlines and formal requirements surrounding nominations are prone to errors – and can jeopardize the election. Our employment law firm supports election boards in legally compliant review and implementation. Have your election documents reviewed now – to ensure your works council election is a success!

Announcement of candidates – timely and accurate information

The valid nomination lists or the nomination proposal must be made public within the company at least one week before election day. This announcement is required by law and ensures that all employees are informed in a timely manner about the candidates standing for election.

However, especially in larger companies—and especially with regard to postal voting—it is advisable to post the lists early. Postal voting documents may only be sent out once the official nominations have been announced within the company.

Those who make the announcement too late risk delays in the dispatch of postal voting documents – and thus possibly a challenge to the election.

Allow sufficient time and publish the candidate lists early. This will ensure that mail-in voters also receive their documents on time. Have your election documents reviewed now by our labor law experts – for a safe and effective works council election.

Preparing for election day – legally compliant and organized

  • Establishment of a suitable polling station or several polling stations
  • Provision of a sealed and tamper-proof ballot box
  • Verification of eligibility to vote based on the electoral roll
  • Provision of voting materials and aids for accessible voting

Counting of votes and announcement of the election results

Immediately after the polling stations close, you conduct the public vote count and announce the preliminary election results. This must be documented—including an election record, which must be prepared by the electoral board.

Constituent meeting – handover of responsibility

Once the election results are known:

  • Notify the elected employees immediately.
  • Make the names of those elected known within the company.
  • Call for an inaugural meeting of the new works council within one week of election day.
  • Hand over all election documents to the new committee – this will end your term as election committee.

Legal pitfalls also lurk in the final phase. Rely on legal advice to ensure the election is completed correctly and on time. Have the final steps reviewed now – we'll support your election committee until the handover!




The Federal Labor Court has ruled that the works council has no co-determination rights regarding salary increases for released works council members. This right only applies to placement or reclassification. Our labor law attorneys explain the background.

Do you have any questions about the topic? Please contact me by phone at 040 524 717 830 or by email to lugowski@smart-arbeitsrecht.de

By decision of November 26, 2024, the Federal Labor Court (BAG) in Erfurt clarified a central issue of works constitution law: the works council has no right of co-determination regarding salary increases for released works council members.

In the court's opinion, the right of co-determination under Section 99 of the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG) is limited exclusively to placements and reclassifications – not to subsequent salary adjustments. The Federal Labor Court thus contradicts the decisions of the lower courts, which had affirmed co-determination.

What impact does this ruling have on corporate practice? Our labor law attorneys shed light on the background and explain what employers and works councils need to consider now.

No co-determination on salary increases for released works council members – Federal Labor Court provides clarity
(Decision of November 26, 2024 – Ref. 1 ABR 12/23)

The Federal Labor Court (BAG) in Erfurt has ruled that works councils have no right of co-determination regarding salary increases for released works council members. According to Section 99 of the Works Constitution Act, this right only applies to placements or reclassifications if the assignment is made to a remuneration structure.

Since salary adjustments for released works council members do not constitute a new classification, no co-determination takes place here. However, the Federal Labor Court emphasizes: Remuneration must be based on the development of comparable employees or may be adjusted to avoid discrimination.

BAG ruling: Works council has no say in matters of remuneration for released members

In this specific case, an employer with two car dealerships in Leipzig was successful. The lower courts had granted the works council a right of co-determination regarding the classification of the released works council chairperson – the Federal Labor Court rejected this view.

The core of the dispute: The works council saw its right of co-determination violated, while the employer argued that the so-called Loss of wages principle This means that the remuneration of released members is based on the income they would earn if they continued working for the company – without any special classification. This is because the special payment has a specific purpose – to compensate for the loss of the job and its associated economic disadvantages.

Image source: Jürgen Fälchle | stock.adobe.com